Accountants blamed for errors in GP pay estimate

GP leaders have rejected accusations that they should have spotted flaws in GP earnings data published this month, blaming accountants for inconsistent approaches to tax returns.

GPC negotiator Dr Richard Vautrey
GPC negotiator Dr Richard Vautrey
Figures published by the Information Centre for Health and Social Care, an NHS agency set up to replace the DoH statistics unit, showed GPs earned more than £106,000 on average in 2004/5.

The data were signed off by a technical steering committee comprising GPC, NHS Employers, DoH and Information Centre officials.

But after concerns were raised by GP, the Information Centre admitted the figures are flawed because they may include employers’ superannuation contributions paid by practices towards GPs’ pensions.

This was not included in GP pay data in previous years, so the 2004/5 figures are not comparable unless this can be separated out.

GPC negotiator Dr Richard Vautrey refused to reveal what steps had been taken to check the earnings data before they were published. He said technical steering committee processes were ‘confidential’.

‘Questions about superannuation were raised during the process of agreeing the figures, and assurances were given,’ he said.

‘But it’s clear that even with HM Revenue and Customs advice, different accountants are doing different things.’

Errors arose because NHS pensions include a 14 per cent contribution from the employer, and 6 per cent from employees.

Prior to the new contract, health authorities paid the 14 per cent directly, but now the funding is included in practice income.

Since 2004/5, GPs have been obliged to include both the 14 per cent employers’ contribution and the 6 per cent personal contribution on tax returns as a personal pension contribution.

But because rules changed part way through the year, not all accountants completed forms in the same way.

The Information Centre has pledged to investigate the extent to which superannuation has distorted the 2004/5 pay data, and to revise the figures accordingly.

Dr Vautrey said: ‘At the time the figures were issued it was done on the understanding of all parties that they were correct.’

Have you registered with us yet?

Register now to enjoy more articles and free email bulletins

Register

Already registered?

Sign in

Follow Us:

Just published

UK on course for 50,000 COVID-19 cases a day by mid-October

UK on course for 50,000 COVID-19 cases a day by mid-October

The UK could see 50,000 COVID-19 cases per day by mid-October, with the epidemic...

Stricter short-term COVID-19 measures needed to avoid second national lockdown, BMA warns

Stricter short-term COVID-19 measures needed to avoid second national lockdown, BMA warns

COVID-19 infection rates will ‘soar’ and the NHS will ‘once again be crippled’ if...

Practices handed one-month opt-out window as revamped network DES unveiled

Practices handed one-month opt-out window as revamped network DES unveiled

NHS England has unveiled a revamped DES package for 2020/21 confirming new targets,...

GPs delivered huge rise in face-to-face consultations in week before NHS England letter

GPs delivered huge rise in face-to-face consultations in week before NHS England letter

GPs delivered a huge increase in face-to-face appointments in the week before NHS...

RCGP facing legal action over stance on assisted dying

RCGP facing legal action over stance on assisted dying

The RCGP is facing legal action over its decision to remain opposed to assisted dying...

Medeconomics Live aims to help practices thrive under the new GP contract

Medeconomics Live aims to help practices thrive under the new GP contract

The one-day, virtual Medeconomics Live conference aims to provide practices with...