#weekinreview - 6 January

A glance back over this week's primary care news, opinion, top tweets and best gaffes.

#News

The DH announced £2m would be available to practices which volunteered to abolish their boundaries from April 2012 in London, Manchester and Nottingham. Although practices are thought unlikely to want to volunteer.

 

#Twitter

Not a great week for Labour’s shadow health team. Shadow public health minister Diane Abbott ‘s (@hackneyabbott) comment that ‘white people love playing ‘divide and rule’’ caused much debate.

The conversation has been deleted but appears in #weekinreview courtesy of journalist TheBrettLeppard.

#Abbott's conversation (now deleted on her account) twitpic.com/8391o0

Here's the moment when Labour leader Ed Miliband called her live on Sky to let her know his thoughts, courtesy of @JamieWood_Sky.

 

Shadow health secretary Andy Burnham (@andyburnhammp) accused GPs who commission of being double paid.

On the coalition's hugely unpopular pensions proposals, paediatrics SHO Keir Shiels (@keirshiels) urged caution over the BMA industrial action poll.

 

Dr Ben Molyneux (@DrBenMolyneux), deputy chairman of the BMA’s junior doctors committee, tweeted:

 

And then tweeted:

#Blogs

Two blogs containing healthcare predictions for 2012 caught #weekinreview’s new year eye.

Mike Birtwistle (@MBirty), managing director of the communications agency MHP Health Mandate, predicts rationing will worsen.

The flashpoint for this debate may no longer be cancer drugs (the Cancer Drugs Fund has largely - if temporarily - defused this), but instead procedures of so-called limited value.  Such interventions can easily be provided privately (and at a relatively low unit cost), creating temptations for clinicians to boost private practices and leading to allegations of ‘top ups’ (an extreme example of this has already been seen at the Haxby and Wigginton Health Centre in York).  The challenge for the Government is that such interventions are rarely appraised by NICE and efficacy and cost effectiveness will vary dramatically according to patient circumstance: a patchwork of policies may well emerge. 

'Such situations are tailor-made for so-called exceptional case panels, yet placing GPs in charge of this (which would be a job for clinical commissioning groups) could be a political nightmare – both for the Government and GPs.  It would make political sense to reach a national understanding of what will and won’t be funded, but doing so would inevitably attract accusations of cuts and rationing.  Yet taking the political heat now could prevent ongoing political pain later (and nearer an election).'

Paul Corrigan

 

Paul Corrigan (@Paul_Corrigan), GP columnist and former adviser to Tony Blair, predicts the departure of Andrew Lansley as health secretary.

So, on the ground, what will happen in 2012?

Maximum waiting times will get worse despite the new politically-motivated targets set by the Government in November 2011.

Several NHS hospitals will lose their 24 hour A and E departments – not because the Government have had the nerve to reconfigure them but because doctors will not go and work in dangerous parts of organisations.

Bungs and subsidies will go to a number of inefficient hospitals in order to keep their bankrupt heads above water.

There will be a number of mergers where failing non-Foundation Trusts merge with each other. This will, unsurprisingly, create new much larger failing non-Foundation Trusts.

Some Foundation Trusts will lose their authorisation.

Some previously enthusiastic GP-led commissioners will walk away from commissioning.

Oh, and since we will then be half way through the Parliament, the PM will have his single reshuffle and we will have a new Secretary of State for Health.'

#OnALighterNote

In other news, RCGP chairwoman Dr Clare Gerada (@clarercgp) was indulging in a rather surprising first. But not before Twitpic-ing it.

 

@clarercgp: My first paella http://pic.twitter.com/ao5isPit

Have you registered with us yet?

Register now to enjoy more articles and free email bulletins

Register

Already registered?

Sign in

Before commenting please read our rules for commenting on articles.

If you see a comment you find offensive, you can flag it as inappropriate. In the top right-hand corner of an individual comment, you will see 'flag as inappropriate'. Clicking this prompts us to review the comment. For further information see our rules for commenting on articles.

comments powered by Disqus