PCTs ignore DH ban on rationing care

More than a third of GPs say PCTs are ignoring a government order not to ration treatment on the basis of cost alone, a GP survey shows.

Dr Jane Lothian: we need an open, honest debate about what the NHS is for (Photograph: Pete Hill)
Dr Jane Lothian: we need an open, honest debate about what the NHS is for (Photograph: Pete Hill)

In the poll of 682 GPs, 35% said local commissioners are restricting access to services on the basis of cost alone, using blanket bans. A total of 90% of GPs backed GPC calls for the DH to create a national list of treatments the NHS will not fund, to eliminate the postcode lottery of rationing.

GPC deputy chairman Dr Richard Vautrey called on the new health secretary, Jeremy Hunt, to take immediate action. 'The DH has repeatedly said it would prevent PCTs and clinical commissioning groups (CCGs) from rationing treatments on cost alone.

'They are clearly not doing that and need to start putting words into action,' he said. 'This will be a big challenge for the new health secretary, and one he needs to address quickly.'

Northumberland LMC secretary Dr Jane Lothian said: 'We need an open, honest debate about what the NHS is for. It's not a "just keep everyone alive" service: it's about keeping the population healthy.'

GPs responding to the poll said PCTs are rationing operations for hernia, joint replacement, gastric banding, varicose veins and minor skin procedures, as well as restricting infertility treatment, tonsillectomies and access to some drugs.

GPs said commissioners are simply raising thresholds so most patients are not eligible for treatment.

One GP said: 'They have devised all sorts of hoops that patients have to jump through to qualify for operations, while disingenuously pretending it is for patients' good and saving money has nothing to do with it.'

In June, a GP investigation found 90% of PCTs had imposed restrictions on procedures deemed 'non-urgent' or of 'low clinical value'. PCTs planned to save £100m a year through these measures.

The GPC has since called for a national list of low-clinical-value procedures to ensure patients are treated 'fairly and consistently'. Dr Lothian said this would be 'extremely helpful' for GPs, putting them in a stronger position when patients demand care: 'A GP could then say: "You don't meet the criteria, but it's not just me saying it; you'll get the same answer from the doctor in the next town".'

Kent GP Dr Julian Spinks said a national list would mean 'decisions about what to fund or not are made on good clinical grounds and not just on how commissioners can save a set amount of money'. But he warned the move to smaller CCGs may worsen variation in decision-making.

Following GP's investigation, former health secretary Andrew Lansley banned PCTs from imposing blanket bans. Labour subsequently called for an 'immediate' review of NHS rationing.

Responding to the GPC's call for action, a DH spokeswoman said: 'If patients need treatment, they should get it when they want it and where they want it. If local health bodies stop patients from having treatments on the basis of cost alone, we will take action against them.'

GP expert views

Shropshire GPSI Dr Louise Warburton, president of the Primary Care Rheumatology Society:
A national list of unacceptable procedures would make everything much easier to implement. It would also mean that CCGs who step outside acceptable practice, and ration procedures for no clear benefit, would be identified.'

Manchester GP Dr Anita Sharma, clinical director of vascular and medicine management at Oldham CCG:
As part of the quality, innovation, productivity and prevention (QIPP) efficiency programmes, GPs are expected to achieve £8.8bn in savings and that means making balanced decisions regarding health care issues at the individual and community levels. Reliable evidence, expertise and sensible judgement is all that is needed to manage patients, which GPs are good at.

'I strongly believe in prescribing less expensive drugs which do not compromise patient care and achieve the same benefit. Why prescribe drugs of low clinical value when other drugs are available which are just as effective and cheaper?

'Perhaps a definition of low-value treatments by NHS to ensure consistency across the country could be the way forward. This surely can save money which could be spent on other areas, but I can see this can be controversial and may raise ethical questions.'

Have you registered with us yet?

Register now to enjoy more articles and free email bulletins

Register

Already registered?

Sign in

Before commenting please read our rules for commenting on articles.

If you see a comment you find offensive, you can flag it as inappropriate. In the top right-hand corner of an individual comment, you will see 'flag as inappropriate'. Clicking this prompts us to review the comment. For further information see our rules for commenting on articles.

comments powered by Disqus