Patient choice claims by government are 'flawed and unscientific'

Government claims that patient choice improves services are based on flawed and unscientific research, according to a leading health economist.

Prof Pollock: No evidence that patient choice in the NHS saves lives (Photograph: Solent News)
Prof Pollock: No evidence that patient choice in the NHS saves lives (Photograph: Solent News)

Prime minister David Cameron has cited research in support of patient choice as a driver for service improvement.

But Professor Allyson Pollock from the University of London and her co-authors warned in a Lancet editorial that the research, by Dr Zack Cooper, did not show any causal relationship between patient choice and quality, as Mr Cameron had claimed.

‘Cooper and colleagues have chosen to base causal conclusions on a fundamentally flawed analysis,’ the editorial’s authors said.

‘The potential consequences of the Health Bill are too serious for politicians to use such work as part of their justification for the legislation.’

They added:  ‘Far from showing that competition saves lives, at best Cooper and colleagues’ study shows that people who have an acute MI and whose GPs are close to a hospital or who have many hospitals in their area might have better chances of survival.

'The policy solution is therefore very different from that currently being followed.’

Have you registered with us yet?

Register now to enjoy more articles and free email bulletins


Already registered?

Sign in

Before commenting please read our rules for commenting on articles.

If you see a comment you find offensive, you can flag it as inappropriate. In the top right-hand corner of an individual comment, you will see 'flag as inappropriate'. Clicking this prompts us to review the comment. For further information see our rules for commenting on articles.

comments powered by Disqus