Overhaul cuts GP input to QOF targets

NICE has quietly scrapped its system for proposing new QOF indicators, in a change GPs fear could make it harder for charities, patients and doctors to contribute to the framework.

Dr Manning: convoluted process (Photograph: M Case-Green)
Dr Manning: convoluted process (Photograph: M Case-Green)

The institute has said indicators will now be based on its quality standards under plans set out by the DoH in its response to the White Paper Liberating the NHS.

Stakeholders will be able to influence the design of quality standards, but not directly put forward new QOF indicators.

Experts warned the changes may marginalise orphan conditions and exclude public and charity participation.

In disease areas where no quality standards yet exist, only NHS Evidence-accredited sources will be used to formulate new indicators. This appears to rule out stakeholder input altogether until later consultation. NICE plans to write 150 standards in total, but just 12 are finished with 16 more in development.

GPC deputy chairman Dr Richard Vautrey said: 'Contributing ideas for QOF should remain as open as possible and I would be extremely concerned if the processes that NICE was putting in place made this more difficult.'

Former GP Dr Chris Manning, founder of the Primary Care Mental Health and Education group, warned that the voice of the public and smaller charities for orphan diseases could be lost in the 'endlessly convoluted' process.

Louise Lakey, policy manager at the Alzheimer's Society, welcomed integration of dementia quality standards into the QOF but added: 'The challenge is to ensure that people have a voice and that the framework is able to respond to the changing environment and emerging medical advances.'

A NICE spokeswoman pointed out that its quality standards were subject to public consultation.

Stephen Robinson

Stephen Robinson recommends

Quality and Outcomes Framework (QOF)

Read more

Have you registered with us yet?

Register now to enjoy more articles and free email bulletins

Register

Already registered?

Sign in

Before commenting please read our rules for commenting on articles.

If you see a comment you find offensive, you can flag it as inappropriate. In the top right-hand corner of an individual comment, you will see 'flag as inappropriate'. Clicking this prompts us to review the comment. For further information see our rules for commenting on articles.

comments powered by Disqus