Letters, calls and emails: Doctors will vote with their feet over the BMA's

Dear Editor

There were many extraordinary aspects to last week's judicial review of the failed and now abandoned Medical Training Application Service (MTAS).

The revelation that the software to match applications to training posts wasn't even completed, never mind tested and that this was known to both the Review Board and, presumably, Patricia Hewitt makes their positions untenable.

Worse was the spectacle of the BMA putting up a barrister against Remedy UK and arguing for the Review Board's compromise on selection. The BMA describes MTAS as a 'complete disaster' but argues that 'in the interest of doctors and patients, the modified system should continue'.

This is despite the fact that the process has been changed twice and cannot by definition be fair for the different cohorts of candidates in the system.

If the BMA had wanted to commit mass membership suicide it couldn't have thought of a better way. On the final day of the judicial review, 700 junior doctors were reported on doctors.net.uk as having resigned from the BMA.

This number was boosted by the 'treacherous' letter from BMA chairman of council James Johnson, published in The Times on 17 May. No doubt hundreds more resignations will follow. After 20 years' membership, this GP will be among their number.

Dr Julian Orton, Ewell, Surrey.

Have you registered with us yet?

Register now to enjoy more articles and free email bulletins

Register

Already registered?

Sign in

Before commenting please read our rules for commenting on articles.

If you see a comment you find offensive, you can flag it as inappropriate. In the top right-hand corner of an individual comment, you will see 'flag as inappropriate'. Clicking this prompts us to review the comment. For further information see our rules for commenting on articles.

comments powered by Disqus