Letter: Correction factor is a disincentive to growth

Dear Editor

I was very pleased to read your front-page headline 'GMS correction factor to end'.

I will be happy if this turns out to be true, as the correction factor which remains static is unfair to practices increasing their list sizes, and is a great incentive to stop growing.

My practice had about 2,500 patients on 1 April 2004, and it now has 4,000. The correction factor means that for core funding we receive about £75 per patient for the first 2,500 patients, but only £54 per patient for the extra 1,500 patients.

Therefore, if we had 4,000 patients as from 1 April 2004, we would now be receiving an extra 1,500 x (£75 - £54) = 1,500 x £21 = £31,500 per annum more than we are now, and for the same workload.

Dr Parmod Luthra Isleworth, Middlesex.

Have you registered with us yet?

Register now to enjoy more articles and free email bulletins

Register

Already registered?

Sign in

Before commenting please read our rules for commenting on articles.

If you see a comment you find offensive, you can flag it as inappropriate. In the top right-hand corner of an individual comment, you will see 'flag as inappropriate'. Clicking this prompts us to review the comment. For further information see our rules for commenting on articles.

comments powered by Disqus