JBS2 authors refute 'deficiencies' claim

Professional organisations behind the Joint British Societies (JBS2) guidelines have hit back at claims it has 'serious deficiencies'.

Dr Rubin Minhas, CHD lead for Medway PCT
Dr Rubin Minhas, CHD lead for Medway PCT

The row follows a critique of the guideline in the International Journal of Clinical Practice by Kent GP Dr Rubin Minhas, CHD lead for Medway PCT.

In it he claims the guideline is 'low quality' and questions the sponsorship-driven nature of the six societies responsible for drawing up the guidelines.

'JBS2 is an old-fashioned guideline that was not produced according to a formal process that is robust, transparent or independent,' Dr Minhas told GP.

But chairman of the JBS2 guidelines Professor David Wood said the criticism was 'unfounded'.

'It is a jaundiced view of professional organisations that have a long history of promoting best practice for patients,' he said.

In a detailed reply to be published in the same journal as Minhas's critique, the six societies defended the 'fit for purpose' approach they took to developing the guidelines instead of the traditional hierarchical method.

This meant lifestyle interventions were given as much weight as drugs, they said.

GPs will be focusing their efforts on those highest risk individuals,' they wrote.

rachel.liddle@haymarket.com

Int J Clin Pract 2007; 6: 1,137-44

Comment below and tell us what you think

Have you registered with us yet?

Register now to enjoy more articles and free email bulletins

Register

Already registered?

Sign in

Before commenting please read our rules for commenting on articles.

If you see a comment you find offensive, you can flag it as inappropriate. In the top right-hand corner of an individual comment, you will see 'flag as inappropriate'. Clicking this prompts us to review the comment. For further information see our rules for commenting on articles.

comments powered by Disqus