Asthma, COPD and obesity indicators rejected by NICE

Indicators for asthma, COPD and obesity were considered and rejected by NICE as part of its recommendations for the 2010/11 QOF.

The institute's QOF committee recommended four indicators for inclusion in the framework, but a further 13 were rejected.

Nine were deemed to represent appropriate topic areas, but to be unsuitable in their current form. They were:

  • asthma review, including an assessment of asthma control, a recording of rhinitis and history of food allergy to nuts or fish.
  • palliative care patients who have a record of preferred place to receive end-of-life care.
  • alcohol use record for patients with schizophrenia, bipolar affective disorder or other psychosis
  • BMI, BP, cholesterol, blood glucose for patients with schizophrenia (four separate indicators)
  • smokers offered referral to the NHS Stop Smoking service or pharmacotherapy with brief support

A further three indicators were judged to represent topics unsuitable for inclusion in QOF. These were:

  • oxygen saturation value and BMI record for patients with COPD (two indicators)
  • weight management advice for newly registered obese patients

Full details of the NICE recommendations are available here.

tom.moberly@haymarket.com

  • Was NICE right to reject these indicators?

 


More news from 19 August

BMA denies £300m swine flu pay request
Practices urged to sue PCT if patient survey appeal rejected
PCT freezes local enhanced services
Airline changes supplementary oxygen charging policy
Unison protest to say NHS 'is blessing for all'
Improving NHS staff health could save £555m

 

Have you registered with us yet?

Register now to enjoy more articles and free email bulletins

Register

Already registered?

Sign in

Before commenting please read our rules for commenting on articles.

If you see a comment you find offensive, you can flag it as inappropriate. In the top right-hand corner of an individual comment, you will see 'flag as inappropriate'. Clicking this prompts us to review the comment. For further information see our rules for commenting on articles.

comments powered by Disqus