Access target hit continuity of care

Continuity of care fell after 48-hour appointment targets were introduced and access has not improved for most patients, research has found.

Unintended effects need to be considered when introducing pay for performance schemes says the National Primary Care Research and Development Centre
Unintended effects need to be considered when introducing pay for performance schemes says the National Primary Care Research and Development Centre

Professor Martin Roland, director of the National Primary Care Research and Development Centre in Manchester, and colleagues studied 42 practices in England.

The researchers sent questionnaires to patients in 2003, 2005 and 2007. There were no changes in quality of care in terms of communication, co-ordination and overall satisfaction. But patients said they found it harder to see their usual GP and were less satisfied with the continuity of the care they received. The researchers blame access targets.

'This outcome may be related to the incentives to provide rapid appointments or to the increased number of specialised clinics in primary care,' they said. 'Unintended effects need to be considered when introducing pay for performance schemes.'

Have you registered with us yet?

Register now to enjoy more articles and free email bulletins

Register

Already registered?

Sign in

Before commenting please read our rules for commenting on articles.

If you see a comment you find offensive, you can flag it as inappropriate. In the top right-hand corner of an individual comment, you will see 'flag as inappropriate'. Clicking this prompts us to review the comment. For further information see our rules for commenting on articles.

comments powered by Disqus