Leveson proposals can protect doctors against media intrusion
By Nick Bostock, 28 November 2012
The Leveson inquiry into press standards is an opportunity to protect doctors against a rising tide of unfair media scrutiny, medico-legal experts believe.
Lord Justice Leveson will report his findings and recommendations on Thursday.
Dr Stephanie Bown, director of policy and communications at the Medical Protection Society (MPS), says the outcome of the inquiry comes at a time when it feels that the media ‘more and more is giving doctors a hard time’.
A month before the end of 2012, the MPS has received 40% more calls relating to the media than it did in the whole of 2011, Dr Bown says.
Anecdotally, she says there has also been a rise in cases where the first thing GPs know about a complaint from a patient is when they receive a call from the media. ‘This is very concerning for them and their practice,’ she says.
Doctors, says Dr Bown, are ‘relatively easy game’ for the media.
‘Scrutiny from the media often comes at a time when doctors are being investigated - media coverage of the first day of a GMC hearing, for example.
‘Allegations are read out and reported in the press, the doctor clearly cannot respond during the course of the hearing. When the claims are not upheld, it doesn’t make such good news, so the coverage is not balanced.’
This is a factor with most court or crime reporting, but Dr Bown adds: ‘The challenge is that doctors are largely expected to hold public trust and confidence, and there are expectations of the profession, such that serious allegations in the press have greater potential to damage their reputation and professional practice that in many other circumstances, because there is that trust relationship with patients.’
The Leveson inquiry is unlikely to address the concerns of the medical profession specifically, Dr Bown concedes.
But she says: ‘We would like to see a change in culture and leadership. Not necessarily a change in legislation - that often throws up unexpected consequences.
‘We’d want to see a strong change in culture built around strong leadership, and sanctions for those who breach a code of conduct.
‘When a doctor is unable to say anything due to confidentiality, responsible reporting should not take a patient’s allegation at face value, it should take some steps to test them and see if they can be verified.
‘We understand the importance of a free press and the entitlement of patients to express concerns in a public forum.
‘But we hope Leveson may be an opportunity to put some safeguards in place.’
Send to a friend
Latest Stories from GP
Latest jobs Jobs web feed
- Salaried GP's Avicenna Medical Practice Negotiable and to include benefits, Bradford, West Yorkshire
- Part-Time Salaried GP (with a view to Partnership) Culcheth Medical Centre Competitive Salary, Warrington, Cheshire
- Full-Time Partner Badgerswood Surgery Negotiable, Hampshire/Surrey/West Sussex Border
- Full Time Partner/Salaried GP (8 sessions) to replace retiring Partner Stirling Road Surgery Details available on request, Devon
- 7 session Partner Chobham and West End Medical Practice Profit Sharing Partner, North West Surrey
- SALARIED /LONG TERM LOCUM LEADING TO FIXED SHARE PARTNERSHIP White City Health Centre £70000 TO £80000 but salary negotiable and dependent on experience and qualifications., London W12 7PH & Southall UB1 1JH
- Harmoni admits running out-of-hours centre with no doctors
- GPs should take on 30% of A&E work, say emergency doctors
- Fears over NHS England capacity to manage general practice
- TV show seeks GP couple as presenters
- Dementia diagnosis must accelerate, warns Hunt
- Integrated care pilot drives up dementia diagnosis
MIMS Drug Search
Possible searches include drugs (by brand, generic ingredient or drug class), diseases and more.